As telehealth benefits for minor injuries or illnesses continue to become a staple of strong company benefits packages, there’s one other area of care that deserves to go digital: mental health services.
Obstacles to Mental Health CareTelemedicine is a natural fit for the challenges of addressing mental health. Consider everything an employee needs to do to receive care for a mental health issue, something roughly 1 in 5 adults struggles with each year:
How Telemedicine Services Can HelpEnter telemedicine, a confidential and convenient route to care. Already, about 58% of major hospitals in the U.S. have already brought in virtual health to support mental health services. But it’s not only embraced by brick-and-mortar health systems: Telehealth companies like LiveHealth Online, part of the Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield network, also offer video-based mental health care that costs about as much as a regular copay for some policyholders. There are many reasons why these emerging digital solutions can be so attractive for employees in need of mental health support:
Is Telehealth Right for Everybody? These benefits make a compelling case for offering telemedicine, but keep in mind that some employees may still prefer seeing a professional in person. That’s why it’s important to enhance, rather than replace, mental health benefits with telemedicine solutions. The goal should be to break down barriers wherever they appear so that employees can get the care they need. With so many U.S. workers struggling in silence, it’s important to give them opportunities to speak to someone who can help. Whether they do so over a phone or in person — or maybe both — is up to them. They just need to know that someone, somewhere, is there to listen. Stay up to date on the latest health care regulations and trends for your small business health insurance plans.
2 Comments
Many employees depend on employer-sponsored benefits to help them achieve their financial security and wellness goals. An often under-appreciated benefit is group life insurance – especially with younger employees who are dealing with large amounts of debt in their lives. According to Money magazine, the average debt for a person under age 35 is $67,000. Life insurance can safeguard other family members against the most common types of debt including mortgage, student loans and can help with funeral expenses. The entire month of September is devoted to Life Insurance Awareness and it is a perfect time for employers to educate and encourage their employees to enroll in this important benefit.
Share this infographic about the importance of life insurance with your employees. You also might also enjoy this article on the subject – The True Value of Life Insurance in Overall Financial Wellness by Greg Poulakos, Anthem’s President of Disability, Absence, Life & Supplemental Health business. Contact your insurance broker, benefits consultant or insurance carrier for more ways life insurance and business health insurance can protect the financial health of your employees and business. The following is an example of the people whom our organization strives to help every day.
Ms. Santos got off the bus after working a 14-hour day as a housekeeper, when she noticed an unbearable pain in her abdomen. She continued to walk toward home, thinking it will go away soon. That evening, she noticed the pain worsening, decided to make some herbal tea in hopes of alleviating her symptoms, and then went to sleep. The next day, the pain persisted when she woke up. The idea of going to a doctor passed through her mind but was quickly overshadowed with the fact that as a single mother providing for her two children, she needs the income from her 14-hour workday to meet her family’s basic expenses. She doesn’t have a designated primary care provider, and she was afraid of not being able to communicate with a provider who did not understand her cultural background and values. After all, she hasn’t seen a health care provider in the two decades she’s been in the United States. As she made the decision to not seek care, she walked out of the house and into another 14-hour, labor-intensive workday with intensifying abdominal pains. Cultural competence in health care is not merely a box to check. Rather, it is a foundational element of providing high-quality health care and a bedrock for meeting the needs of an increasingly diverse population of patients. Cultural competence becomes effective when those working for health care providers and health systems—from the sanitation staff to the chief medical officer—systematically consider how to integrate it into their approach in delivering care and their interactions with patients. This understanding is nothing new. In research published in Health Affairs in 2005, the authors—from Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Weill Medical College of Cornell University—wrote that cultural competence was “evolving from a marginal to a mainstream health care policy issue and as a potential strategy to improve quality and address disparities,” following their interviews with 37 experts in cultural competence from managed care, government, and academia. Cultural competence, they said, was emerging for three reasons:
More recent research published in PLOS ONE in 2015 focused on end-of-life conversations. Here, researchers from Stanford University School of Medicine found that doctors often struggled to talk to patients of a different ethnicity. A Personal Experience The health care system can be daunting for anyone, let alone for people who may lack the appropriate resources to navigate its complexities. From providers to paperwork, a simple trip to the doctor’s office can be confusing and intimidating for many patients. For those for whom language or cultural barriers exist, this presents even more layers of complexity and anxiety, creating systemic barriers to care for this population. Throughout my career, I’ve set out to change the system at a community level to better meet the needs of those patients. As an executive director of a public mental health integration program within the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, I work to recruit, train, and deploy behavioral health clinicians across New York City—and ultimately help high-risk, vulnerable populations gain greater access to culturally competent care. While there are tremendous challenges, there’s a very clear need to create new pathways and strategize on how we develop tomorrow’s clinical workforce, not just to address current or future shortages, but to do so with cultural humility in mind. We’re working to take cultural understanding to the next level, appreciating cultural differences in a way that helps us diversify our health care workforce and really connect with the people we serve. As president of the Academy of Medical & Public Health Services, a public health not-for-profit organization in Brooklyn, New York, I work to integrate the mainstream health system with the community-based social support system through a workforce of community health workers who help coordinate care for high-risk, vulnerable immigrants, like Ms. Santos, who otherwise would not seek care. By having a workforce that hails from the same community as the people we serve, who look like that community, speak the same language, and understand its cultural values, we increase access to—and quality of—care simultaneously. The United Health Foundation's Diverse Scholars Initiative Key to helping me on this path was my participation in the United Health Foundation’s Diverse Scholars Initiative. As part of the initiative, I received a scholarship from the Asian & Pacific Islander American Scholars to help me attend New York University (NYU) in a joint-degree neuroscience and public administration program with a specialization in health law and finance, through the NYU College of Arts and Sciences’ Center for Neural Science and the NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. Through participation in the Diverse Scholars Initiative annual forum, I learned about complex health policy issues at a national level, which helped me to better understand the intricacies of our health care system in the United States and at the local level. In 2019 the Diverse Scholars Initiative provided assistance for nearly 230 scholars across 40 states. Since the United Health Foundation launched the initiative in 2007, it has provided more than $20 million in assistance to students and funded nearly 2,600 scholarships to undergraduate and graduate students who are pursuing careers in primary care and who demonstrate a commitment to working in underserved communities. One of the foundation’s core missions is to build healthier communities by helping to modernize and diversify the health care workforce to meet the needs of people from all backgrounds. That means investing in people, technology, and programs to keep up with the rapid pace of change in the industry. Continuing to integrate cultural competency into the health care system requires an all-hands-on-deck approach. All stakeholders—from hospitals and health systems, to physician practices, to health insurers, to government agencies, to educational institutions, and beyond—must be willing to recognize the needs of people from all backgrounds and work to prioritize meeting those needs so as to optimize care. After all, the best care we can give someone is informed by who they are. Check the chip application pa carefully before exploring the CHIP programs, this will help you to find best plans for your child. By 2017, Medicaid expansion had provided health coverage to more than 17 million low-income adults in 32 states and helped lower the overall uninsured rate in the United States to 8.8 percent. But critics have long looked for highly misleading ways to undermine the program, such as portraying improper payments and enrollment errors as Medicaid beneficiary fraud or claiming Medicaid expansion has fueled the opioid crisis. The latest is an attempt to argue that the people enrolling in Medicaid do not qualify.
In a recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) commentary entitled “Obamacare’s Medicaid Deception,” authors Brian Blase and Arron Yelowitz draw inaccurate conclusions about the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) expansion of Medicaid to low-income adults. The authors wrongly assert that “most people who gained coverage have enrolled in Medicaid regardless of income.” The commentary is based on a National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) working paper using income data and coverage source reported by individuals in the Census Bureau’s Annual Community Survey (ACS). But the NBER study, co-authored by Yelowitz, does not make adjustments to the ACS data to simulate the complex construct of how income and household size are actually counted and verified for adults in Medicaid. Nor is it based on actual administrative enrollment data. To explain his error, it would be most appropriate to discuss how the ACS calculates income, since the primary but unproven conclusion of the commentary is that a large share of individuals with Medicaid coverage are not income-eligible. In fact, there are many reasons ACS survey income data would not align with the way income is counted in Medicaid. First, Medicaid eligibility is based on taxable – not gross – income. Second, certain types of income, such as Supplemental Security Income for low-income, disabled adults, child support, and Veterans benefits are not included in household income when determining eligibility for Medicaid expansion adults. Third, household size for Medicaid is based on the number of individuals in the tax-filing unit for tax-filers while only parents and children are counted in non-tax filing households. The ACS household requests information for everyone in the household, including non-married partners, in-laws, roommates, and other individuals who should not be counted in determining the household size or income for Medicaid. This brief from the State Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC), although focused on estimating Medicaid eligibility for the adult population pre-ACA, illustrates how results differ when adjusting Census data appropriately for household size and income. The study found that relying on unadjusted data underestimated the number of adults with income at or below 138 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) by 16 million, or 8.9 percent, in 2010. Importantly, Medicaid eligibility is not determined based on self-reported income. All income must be verified through trusted electronic sources when possible, or through documentation provided by the enrollees. Additionally, Medicaid eligibility is based on current monthly income – not total income in the past 12 months - as income volatility is significant among low-income individuals. According to this Health Affairs study, more than one-third of individuals with income below 200 percent FPL shift in or out of Medicaid eligibility in a six-month period and, within a year, 50 percent will. Individuals who experienced a decrease in income as a result of job change or reduction in hours may qualify for Medicaid mid-year but appear to be over-income for the year overall. Another crucial point to understand is that income thresholds can vary by population within Medicaid. Pregnant women, individuals with disabilities, and those needing long-term services and supports may qualify for Medicaid at higher incomes. For example, according to data from the Kaiser Family Foundation, the median eligibility level for pregnant women is 205 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) and the median income for disabled individuals to “buy-in” to Medicaid is 256 percent FPL, both well above the Medicaid adult expansion threshold of 138 percent FPL. The NBER study attempts to test its results against these potential alternative pathways, but it does not provide a sufficient explanation to fully understand how it conducted these sensitivity tests. And while the sensitivity analysis appears to substantially change their results, the authors still focus on the unadjusted numbers. As a result, the commentary’s conclusion that “virtually all of the increase in participation for income-ineligible adults is coming from those with no obvious path to qualify for Medicaid” is completely unsubstantiated. The authors try to buttress their unfounded conclusion by grossly misrepresenting the results of a legislative Medicaid audit in Louisiana with their statement that “82 percent of expansion enrollees were ineligible at some point during the year they were enrolled.” The fact is that the Louisiana audit first identified fewer than 20,000 enrollees – less than 4 percent of the estimated 500,000 expansion enrollees – whose income appeared to exceed the Medicaid eligibility level at some point during their enrollment. From that group, the audit pulled a targeted sample of just 100 individuals with the highest wage amounts during a study period over 21 months and determined that 82 people were ineligible for coverage for some period of time (without taking into consideration the relevant rules and actual data sources that were appropriately used to calculate eligibility initially). In no way does the audit conclude that 82 percent of all expansion enrollees were ineligible at some point during their enrollment as authors incorrectly declare. The bottom line is this – the NBER working paper used as the basis for the WSJ commentary is relying on unadjusted self-reported survey data as a proxy for actual Medicaid income eligibility and enrollment. It cannot and should not be construed as an audit of improper enrollment. The ACS is a reliable data source but should not be used to draw misleading conclusions about income eligibility and enrollment in Medicaid as the authors do. Instead, researchers should follow best practices in using public data – such as the State Health Access Data Assistance Center and the Urban Institute do -- to simulate how eligibility is determined in Medicaid. If you want to know more about the business health insurance then please send your queries by dropping a comment below. The choices are numerous and confusing. Whether you’re looking for yourself or your parents, here is some guidance.
We were so confused. My wife’s mother was going through medical issues that could potentially have left her needing long-term care. But we had never taken a hard look at our options if that happened. She lives 2,000 miles away, and we all had to start thinking about what the next steps would be if things did not go well with her. And we had no idea where to start. We didn’t even have the vocabulary: What’s the difference between assisted living and a nursing home? So we began to study, and visited an assisted living facility near our home to get a sense of our options. In our ignorance, we were like a lot of other people. Few of us are prepared, or even want to think about, the options for our parents — or, especially, for ourselves. “Even the most sophisticated people have no idea what these things mean,” said Daniel Reingold, president and chief executive of RiverSpring Health in New York. And yet, he noted, while aging happens gradually, the need for long-term care can arise suddenly. “Frequently, the decision-making process comes in a crisis,” like when a parent falls or begins to wander the neighborhood, he said. It’s easy to see why people don’t plan ahead. Infirmity and mortality are frightening. Ruth Katz, senior vice president of public policy/advocacy at Leading Age, an industry group representing nonprofit senior service providers, said, “People don’t like, in the prime of their lives, to think about the possibility that you’re going to need help doing very personal things,” including going to the bathroom and getting out of bed. Research from the Department of Health and Human Services suggests that more than half of Americans now turning 65 will need long-term care and services, and one in seven adults will have some kind of disability for more than five years. Infirmity, then, is predictable, and is, at least, something we should plan for. But then there’s the cost. “People think they have an issue paying for a college education — wait ’til you see how much long-term care costs,” said Nicholas Castle, a professor in the School of Public Health at West Virginia University. The Health and Human Services report says someone turning 65 today will pay, on average, $138,000 for their long-term care, with families paying about half the cost and the rest picked up by public programs and insurance. The average cost of living in a private room in a nursing home is more than $90,000 a year, which beats even Sarah Lawrence. This, then, is an introduction to the basics of long-term care, to help you start your own search more informed — whether you are planning for the care of a parent or yourself. STAYING HOME When trouble strikes, what most people want is to stay at home as long as possible, with assistance from family or paid assistance that can include a home care aide or nurse. That option can even include retrofitting the home with features like ramps and grab bars. (Health insurance and Medicare might pay for some of those services, for a certain amount of time.) INDEPENDENT LIVING Some people decide to move to independent living complexes, which can offer a sense of community and activities while letting somebody else take care of some of the irritations like lawn care, housekeeping and cooking meals. ASSISTED LIVING For those who find themselves unable to live independently, however, and need help with activities of daily living — which can include help with getting dressed, going to the toilet and sorting medications — this is an option. It can have much of the look and sensibility of independent living but with a higher level of care and monitoring. Many of these facilities also offer what’s known as memory care for people with cognitive impairment like Alzheimers and other forms of dementia. NURSING HOMES These facilities provide round the clock care for people with more serious health conditions. Many people resist the idea of nursing home care, though the facilities are regulated under federal law, unlike assisted living facilities, which are regulated under a patchwork of state laws and vary widely. Nursing homes qualify for a substantial degree of coverage under Medicaid, which generally kicks in after other assets are depleted. For many people, nursing homes can be the best option, Ms. Katz said. “Friends will say to me, ‘I think it’s time for my mom to move into someplace where she will get some help — I don’t think she needs to go into a nursing home. She only needs assisted living.’ I want to ask, ‘What do you mean — and what do you think you mean?’” Some facilities known as continuing care retirement communities offer a blended approach, which allows residents to take on additional services as they need them. It can be an expensive option, with costs rising as the level of care rises. Professor Castle of West Virginia University recommends careful shopping, with visits to facilities and an eye out for hidden costs. “It’s a bit more complicated than buying a car,” he said. And, he added, a family might need care quickly, “but the correct care might not be the correct care for the next two or three years.” Then there is the question of whether the kind of care that’s needed is even available where you live, especially in rural areas where options can be few. “You can have some of the best nursing homes around in your location, and it doesn’t mean they’re going to have a bed,” he said. When planning for parents, it’s important to ask what they want. My mother-in-law told us that she had worked as a nurse in a nursing home, years ago, and the experience was a sad one. “I don’t want to be in a place like that,” she said, though she acknowledged that many facilities have most likely upgraded since then. She did not want to move out of her home unless she absolutely had to. Ultimately, she was able to get by with some help at home for a number of weeks until she had fully recovered. Still, the research we had done was helpful; we felt that we could confront the future with a little more confidence the next time these questions came up. If you want to know more about the small business health insurance then please send your queries by dropping a comment below. Health care, so far perhaps the biggest issue in the Democratic primary, is also the most complicated issue facing government and the public. Unfortunately the debate is filled with persistent misconceptions, from the role insurance company profits play in health care costs to who is actually paying for workers’ health coverage.
Clarifying four fundamental health care fallacies could make it easier for voters to square some of the Democratic proposals — and their critiques — with reality: Fallacy No. 1: Employers pay for employees’ health insurance. Employers write checks that cover most health insurance premiums for employees and their dependents. But as the Princeton health economist Uwe Reinhardt once explained, employer-sponsored insurance is like a pickpocket taking money out of your wallet at a bar and buying you a drink. You appreciate the cocktail until you realize you paid for it yourself. With health coverage, employers write the check to the insurer, but employees bear the cost of the premium — the entire premium, not just the portion listed as their contribution on their pay stub. The premium money that goes to the insurance company is cash that employers would otherwise deposit in employees’ accounts like the rest of their salary. The fallacy is in thinking an employer’s contribution comes out of profits. In fact, higher health insurance premiums mean lower wages for workers. Since 1999, health insurance premiums have increased 147 percent and employer profits have increased 148 percent. But in that time, average wages have hardly moved, increasing just 7 percent. Clearly workers’ wages, not corporate profits, have been paying for higher health insurance premiums. Health care costs are one though not the only reason wages have stagnated over the last few decades. With health insurance costs rising faster than growth in the economy, more labor costs go to benefits like health insurance and less to take-home pay. Yet the belief that employees don’t pay for their own health insurance is widespread. One reason is that individuals cannot be sure what causes their wages to change or remain stagnant for decades. Another reason is that employers want Americans to believe that they pay for their workers’ health insurance. Still another reason is that there are those who profit from the employment-based system: drug companies, device manufacturers, specialty physicians and high-income individuals. They all want you to believe companies are being magnanimous in giving you insurance. Who else benefits from the belief in this fallacy? Opponents of national health insurance. Fallacy No. 2: Medicare for All is unaffordable. The key to evaluating the cost of Medicare for All is to distinguish between increasing spending on health care and shifting expenditures from private insurance to the federal government. True, Medicare for All would increase federal health care spending. But that is not the same as increasing total health care spending, which was over $3.5 trillion last year. Instead, Medicare for All would move money from one column (private health insurance spending) to another (federal health spending); it does not automatically increase total costs. A recent study by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University — a free-market center generally hostile to government programs — estimates that for the 10 years between 2022 and 2031 the total national health costs for Senator Bernie Sanders’s Medicare for All plan would actually be $50.1 trillion. That would be $2 trillion less than if we let the system operate as it currently does. However, Mercatus researchers doubt that the Sanders’s plan would ultimately save trillions because they believe Congress would have to increase Medicare rates paid to hospitals and physicians to get the legislation enacted. They may be right — or wrong. But that is a different argument — a prediction about the politics of enacting laws — than that Medicare for All would inherently increase total health care spending. We have our doubts about Medicare for All. But unaffordability is not a reason to oppose it. Whether it’s our current arrangement or a future Medicare for All, the per capita cost of our health care system already far exceeds that of any other industrialized country — including those with single-payer systems. When you hear a health care price tag in the trillions, know that the existing system has already brought us there. Fallacy No. 3: Insurance companies’ profits drive health care costs. In the second Democratic presidential debate, Senator Bernie Sanders declared that the health care industry makes $100 billion in profits. He once railed against the insurance company Anthem for denying a claim while noting that it reported “fourth-quarter profits for 2017 had increased by 234 percent to $1.2 billion.” Many Americans believe that profits have no place in health care. They see for-profit health insurance, like buying and selling kidneys and livers for transplantation, as what the Nobel Prize winner Alvin Roth termed a “repugnant industry” — something that should not be exchanged in the market. That is an important moral stand, but it makes no difference to the claim that eliminating for-profit insurers will reduce high health care costs. The fact is, we could eliminate those profits and it would hardly matter to the cost of health care. You would not notice it in your premiums. For the eight largest for-profit health insurance companies, in 2016, their cumulative revenue amounted to nearly $452.2 billion and profits were $22.1 billion, for a profit margin of about 5 percent. By contrast, technology companies, banks and major drug companies generally make more than 20 percent profit. True, $22.1 billion is a lot of money — but it is 0.6 percent of health spending. And last year alone health care costs increased over $130 billion — six times insurance company profits. Health care spending would not be significantly cheaper if all insurance companies’ profits were zero. There are far more savings to be had in other efforts — by cutting unnecessary patient services, for example, or by making physicians and hospitals more efficient — to deliver the same care at a lower cost. Fallacy No. 4: Price transparency can bring down health care costs.“Hospitals will be required to publish prices that reflect what people pay for services,” said President Trump when he signed his executive order on health care price transparency. “Prices will come down by numbers that you wouldn’t believe. The cost of health care will go way, way down.” There is no doubt that prices for medical procedures can range widely even within the same city or state. For instance, M.R.I.s of the spine can vary threefold in Massachusetts and mammograms fivefold in San Francisco. Conservatives argue that informing patients of prices for tests and treatments will induce them to shop for lower-cost services, saving them, insurers and the country money. In theory, the beauty of price transparency is that neither the government nor insurers impose cost controls; the invisible hand of the market does it all. Yet demonstrations of price transparency have been tried many times in many places, and in reality, it has not reduced the cost of care. One recent study by Harvard Medical School researchers involved hundreds of thousands of employees and used a website telling them what they would pay out-of-pocket if they chose particular physicians and hospitals. The result: no savings. A follow-up study using another set of employers and another price transparency tool found the same result: no savings. Since 2007, New Hampshire has had a state website, N.H. Health Cost, that allows patients to select a medical procedure, insurer and ZIP code and then get a list of prices for the procedure from various providers. The most promising study of N.H. Health Cost suggests a few million dollars in savings per year. That works out to be about $5 per New Hampshire resident. The fact is, price transparency will not make health care costs “go way, way down.” Health insurance insulates the patient from price. Over 80 percent of the cost of medical care is paid by private and public insurance. Patients have little incentive to seek out the cheapest provider. When pricing websites exist, few patients use them. Even in the most favorable studies, when offered a price transparency tool, only 12 percent of patients took advantage of it; usually it’s less than 4 percent of patients. Furthermore, price considerations are useful for choosing only about 40 percent of procedures — routine services like colonoscopies, M.R.I. scans and laboratory tests. Most of the expensive services — think heart catheterizations, cancer chemotherapy and organ transplants — are not the kind of thing you decide based on price. Finally, in health care, Americans usually put relationships ahead of money. Once patients find a physician they trust and a hospital they like, they tend to stick with them even if there is a lower-cost alternative nearby. American health care is complex and any simplistic solution is likely to be based on a fallacy. But that doesn’t mean there is nothing we can do. There are solutions — they just don’t make for bumper sticker phrases like Medicare for All or Eliminate For-Profit Insurers or Price Transparency. Explore chip health insurance pa and get the best plans for your children, if you want to know more details then please send your queries in the comment section. With M&A activity for life insurers or blocks of in-force business poised for a possible spike, acquirers of life businesses should consider factors that are peculiar to, or disproportionately affect, the life and annuity sector relative to other types of insurers such as property-casualty (p&c).
Such features specific to life companies include the following, which require a dedicated focus on due diligence and may also require appropriate tailoring of representations and warranties or other provisions in the purchase contract:
It can be expected that compliance with these rules for new business will be a key focus of New York and other state insurance regulators going forward. Acquirers will want to make sure they understand the reach of any such new requirements and the resulting compliance implications for their target.
An acquirer should consider all these developments carefully in the context of a particular insurance target, not only from a valuation standpoint but also for purposes of representations and warranties in the purchase agreement such as those relating to actuarial reserving, reinsurance, investments, capital adequacy and regulatory and other compliance. If you want to know more about the pa health insurance companies then please send your queries by dropping a comment below. You likely won’t be able to live off your 401(k) alone in retirement, but you should be able to combine your 401(k) with alternative savings, other passive investments, and Social Security to live a financially free life when the time comes to withdraw at the age of 59.5. Most Americans don’t have pensions. The reality is that the median account balance in the U.S. is only around $72,000 for 55-64 year olds in 2019 according to Vanguard, one of the largest 401k managers. The average 401k balance for 55-64 year olds is roughly $178,000. But the average is screwed up to due the super wealthy. Even with $178,000 in your 401k at retirement age, you aren’t going to be living it up for the next 20 – 30 years without alternative sources of income. According to data from Fidelity, here’s the average 401k breakdown by age in 2018:
Ages 20 – 29: $9,900 Ages 30 – 39: $38,400 Ages 40 – 49: $91,000 Ages 50 – 59: $152,700 Ages 60 – 69: $167,700 Ages 70 – 79: $160,200 Given the median age of Americans is 35.3 according to the US Census Bureau, the median 401(k) balance per person should be closer to $150,000 – $500,000 according to my 401(k) retirement savings guide instead of these pitifully low levels. In this article, I’d like to share some stories on what happened to all the missing savings because we all know we should be maxing out our 401k every year for as long as we work. Financial Samurai 401k Savings GuidelineThe below chart shows what a typical 22 year old college graduate should have accumulated in their 401(k) if they followed my advice and started maxing out their 401(k) after two years of working. The maximum pre-tax contribution amount is $19,000 in 2019 and will likely increase by $500 a year every couple of years to keep up with inflation. I’ve divided the chart into three columns to account for older savers, middle age savers, and younger saves due to the different maximum contribution limits. I’ve also accounted for different return and company matching metrics. The bottom line: everybody who consistently contributes to their 401k over a 38 year career will likely have at least $1,000,000 in their account. The 401k savings targets by age can also act as a total savings guideline as well if you wish. 401k By Age Discrepancies Explained I’ve been consulting with more clients about their personal finances and what I’ve discovered is that something always seems to come up and knock someone off their retirement savings path. It’s all fine and dandy to assume everyone should logically max out their 401(k) or at least save 20% of their after tax income until retirement, but this is seldom the case. With consent from my clients, let me share several case studies to illustrate some points. I’ll also highlight one reader’s e-mail feedback about the topic as well as my own example. Names are changed for privacy reasons. Case Study One – Family To Support Joe is 42 years old and makes $120,000 a year as an engineer. He’s been working for 19 years and has $80,000 in his 401(k) (vs $300,000+ recommended). When I asked him to share his 401(k) situation he shrugged. He never considered maxing out his 401(k) because he always thought he wouldn’t have enough money left to take care for his wife and son. His wife worked for the first eight years and decided to stay at home after giving birth. Going from a two income family to a one income family is difficult if you’re not use to saving half. Joe has about $12,000 in after-tax savings which will cover about four months of living expenses just in case something bad happens. Given the thin buffer, we talked about the importance of getting long term disability. When I dug deeper, I realized Joe has a penchant for fixing up old cars. All told, he’s spent over $60,000 after taxes to beautify his two 1965 Mustangs. Case Study Two – Expensive Living Sally is 32 years old, and makes $75,000 + bonus as a medical equipment sales rep. Sally got her Master’s degree in healthcare, and graduated with $27,000 in debt at the age of 24. She pays about $500 a month in student loans which she plans to pay off in 10 years tops. After seven and a half years of working at a reputable firm, Sally has $70,000 in her 401(k) compared to a recommended $127,000 after eight years of work experience according to my guide. Sally only contributed 10% of her annual gross salary into her 401(k) because of her school debt, car payments, credit card payments, and $2,600 a month rent here in San Francisco. Sally’s case shows that education is expensive and good paying jobs come with higher cost of living. Sally has about $5,000 in savings in the bank. Case Study Three – High Income Burnout Susie is 34 years old, single and makes $150,000 + bonus as a VP at an investment bank based in San Francisco. She’s been working for 12 consecutive years out of college. In between years 10 and 12, Susie took a 1.5 year hiatus to become a baker during the financial crisis. She was burned out and wanted to try something new. But, after spending $25,000 for tuition, missing out on 1.5 years worth of income, and getting screamed at while making only $10 an hour, she realized being a baker at a restaurant was not for her. “If I’m going to get yelled at making $10 an hour, I might as well make a lot of money!” Susie joked. Susie has about $150,000 in her 401(k), 50% higher than the current median according to Transamerica. However, given she didn’t earn any money for 1.5 years and payed a lot for tuition, Susie is also about $50,000 light based on my guide. Susie was only contributing about 10% of her pre-tax income to her 401(k) for her entire career because she didn’t want to tie her money up beyond the company match. Case Study Four – Highly Educated Couple An e-mail from a reader responding to the Average Net Worth For The Above Average Person article: “I noticed that most of your posts are geared towards people who start working at age 22 with minimal debt – as just one example, your “above average” people projections. But many “above average” people do not start working at age 22 and incur substantial debt before they start working. For example, I am a lawyer that obtained a master’s degree and then a law degree before starting my career at age 28. My wife is a doctor, who completed her residency and started practicing at age 28 as well. Both of us started our careers with substantial student loan burdens – over $325,000 between the both of us. Our late start means we lose a lot of the magic of compounding interest. And our debt burden takes a big chunk of our monthly income. These are significant challenges.” Case Study Five – Early Retiree My 401(k) was about $400,000 when I left work at age 34 in 2012. It has grown to about $550,000 in 2019. What I miss about work was my $20,000 – $25,000 a year in profit sharing. That addition was a huge boost to my annual 401(k) that cannot be underestimated. It was only until 2014 when I realized I could open up a Solo 401(k) with the freelance income I was generating. My Solo 401(k) now has about $200,000. Case Study Six – A Nasty Divorce! A reader shares his story, What is misleading as to why many 401k’s are half or less what they should be is one word…DIVORCE. I am currently 44 yrs old. 7 years ago at age 37 I had $125,000 in my 401k and then….BOOM! Stock market crashed and my 401k was worth $80,000. Yeah not fun. 7 years later it has now recovered but that’s lost years and now my 401k is worth $130,000 and I’m getting divorced and half goes to my wife. Now I’m back to $65,000. Ridiculous. Over 50% of married couples get divorced and many men are paying Child Support and Alimony and aside from losing half our retirement we now have nothing for years to invest…but I digress.” Case Study Seven – Medical Debt Medical debt is one of the leading causes of bankruptcy in America. Deena, 51, explains, “I have a rare disease and nearly died (which means time in the ICU, operations, and 1 – 6 month recovery where I work part time or not at all) in 1995, 97, 99, 02, 03, 05, 06, and 07. Then I met the love of my life, who had ovarian cancer and passed away after 4 painful years. Because she was the wrong gender, we could not legally get married, so her insurance and medical costs were in the hundred of thousands of dollars. Medical debt on top of not being able to work is a huge factor that needs to be considered. After 10 years, I have just finished paying off both of our medical debt.” Technical Reasons Why 401(k) Balances Are So LowNow that we’ve heard from seven different case studies why their 401(k) balances are so low, let’s look into some technical reasons as well. Four aspects of the U.S. retirement system could explain the discrepancy between potential and actual accumulations at age 60. • First, the immaturity of the 401(k) system means that many 60-year-olds did not have access to a 401(k) plan early on in their careers, so they would have accumulated less than workers covered throughout their work lives. • Second, the lack of universal coverage means that workers are not always in jobs that offer retirement plans and, therefore, are not always able to contribute. • Third, participants’ ability to tap their account before retirement means that accumulations leak out. • Fourth, fees can significantly erode net returns on investments. Life Happens To Us AllWe all know we should be maxing out your 401(k)s but don’t because something always seems to get in the way. Life gets in the way of our retirement savings plans all the time. We have tuition to pay, expensive cars to fix, vacations to take, concerts to attend, shoes to buy, Range Rover Superchargers to drive, alimony to pay, sickness to deal with and economic dislocations to experience. Here’s another chart comparing the median and average 401(k) balance by age and my 401(k) guidance if we continuously max out your 401(k) each year. Some of us just like to honestly blow lots of money and not give a damn! There’s always an excuse for not saving. However, if you don’t want to become one of those tragedy stories or a burden to your fellow citizens, then I suggest increasing your 401(k) contributions and after tax savings percentages. If the amount you are savings doesn’t hurt, then you are not saving enough. At the end of our careers, we only have ourselves to blame if we come up short. Unless you have developed alternative income streams, paid off your house, and have other after tax savings, living off $350,000-$500,000 for the next 20-30 years is just $12,000 – $25,000 a year. Pay yourself first before anything else and max out your 401K. After you’ve maxed out your 401(k), figure out where you can save some more in your after-tax investment accounts to generate passive income. You can no longer count on a pension or Social Security to support you in retirement. The only thing you can count on for living a comfortable retirement is you! Recommendation To Grow Your Net Worth Manage Your Finances In One Place: The best way to build wealth is to get a handle on your finances by signing up with Personal Capital. They are a free online platform which aggregates all your financial accounts on their Dashboard so you can see where you can optimize. Before Personal Capital, I had to log into eight different systems to track 28 different accounts (brokerage, multiple banks, 401K, etc) to track my finances. Now, I can just log into Personal Capital to see how my stock accounts are doing, how my net worth is progressing, and where my spending is going. One of their best tools is the 401K/Portfolio Fee Analyzer which has helped me save over $1,700 in annual portfolio fees I had no idea I was paying. You just click on the Investment Tab and run your portfolio through their fee analyzer with one click of the button. Another awesome feature is their Retirement Planning Calculator which uses your real inputs to run a Monte Carlo simulation to best estimate your retirement financials. Definitely see how you stand! Author Bio: Sam started Financial Samurai in 2009 to help people achieve financial freedom sooner, rather than later. He spent 13 years working in investment banking, earned his MBA from UC Berkeley, and retired at age 34 in San Francisco in 2012. To stay on top of your wealth, Sam recommends signing up with Personal Capital’s free financial tools. With Personal Capital, you can track your cash flow, x-ray your investments for excessive fees, and make sure your retirement plans are on track. For 2019 and beyond, Sam is most interested in investing in the heartland of America where real estate valuations are much lower and net rental yields are much higher. Interest rates have plummeted to 2-year lows and demand for real estate remains strong. Fundrise is his favorite real estate crowdfunding platform. It’s free to sign up and explore. Explore best health insurance harrisburg and get the best plans for your family, if you want to know more details then please send your queries in the comment section. First of three articles.
Caretaking occupies a paradoxical place in the American mind. On the one hand, we cast caretaking for babies and children as a sacred duty of the private sphere. We lionize the bonds between parents and their children in movies, songs and storybooks. We romanticize the kinds of wisdom that are passed from an aging parent to a doting child in the dusk of life. At the end of our days, it is caring — love in action — that we feel matters most. On the other hand, we undervalue caretaking and tolerate schools, workplaces and neighborhoods designed for another era. According to the United States Department of Labor, 70 percent of mothers with children under 18 work outside the home, and mothers are the primary or sole earners for 40 percent of households, compared with 11 percent in 1960. But the United States remains off the list of 41 industrialized and developing countries that guarantee their citizens some form of paid family leave, according to the Pew Research Center. (The benefit is mandated in several states, however, including New York, California, New Jersey and Rhode Island.) The school day ends around 3 p.m. And we have a hodgepodge of living and care arrangements for the elderly and disabled, most of which are expensive, some of which have been making headlines lately for abuse and neglect. So we ennoble narratives of caregiving while simultaneously rating it low priority. The professionals — child care and elder care providers, most of them women of color, many of them immigrants — who work so hard to fill in that cognitive dissonance are underpaid and underprotected by labor laws. (The typical home care worker is paid only $15,100 a year.) As Ai-jen Poo, author of “The Age of Dignity” and a co-director of an advocacy organization, Caring Across Generations, puts it, “This is the work that makes all other work possible.” This is not a “women’s issue,” as it has so often been framed, even though women still do a majority of caretaking, both paid and unpaid. Nor is it an individual problem to be solved. As Sarita Gupta, the other co-director of Caring Across Generations, explains: “People are realizing that there is a care system and that it affects everyone. Everyone has a care story. Americans are starting to ask: Why is this so hard? They’re angry, confused and want to do something about it.” First, it’s critical to understand the demographic shifts at play. Millennials, the largest generation in the United States, are starting to have children. According to a recent report by New America, a centrist policy institute, “On any given day, about 12 million children under the age of 5 will need a safe place to go and someone loving to care for them.” The average annual cost to have your toddler in a child-care center full time is almost $10,000, higher than the average cost of in-state college tuition ($9,410) and 85 percent of the monthly median cost of rent in the United States. At the same time, baby boomers, the second-largest generation, are aging and requiring more care. By 2050, it’s estimated, 27 million people will need long-term care or personal assistance, or both, which now cost $3,000 a month on average per person. Members of the “sandwich generation,” as it is known — adults in their 40s and 50s — have it rough. According to the Pew Research Center, one in seven of them are providing financial support to both a child and an aging parent. But it’s not just demographics that are shifting; it’s also the life course itself. Laura L. Carstensen, a professor of psychology and the director of the Stanford Center on Longevity, believes that the demand for caretaking has changed sharply as our life span has increased. “Until the 20th century, we couldn’t expect to live much past our late 40s,” she says. “Now you have people living pretty vibrantly well into their 80s. We all need to learn how to take care of others and how to be taken care of.” There are three dominant sectors in which people are trying to devise solutions to the impending caretaking crisis: for profit, nonprofit and government. In the for-profit case, according to a recent exploration by designers at IDEO, an international design and consulting firm, Americans generate $3.67 trillion in care work but pay only for $393 billion of it. “The whole system needs a reboot,” Patrice Martin, one of those designers, explains. “Care needs to be reimagined. We need to start designing for the families of today rather than the stories of yesterday.” Indeed, a variety of new businesses are being built to answer the call for more help. Wellthy Incorporated, for example, matches overwhelmed family caregivers with what the company calls a “personal health care assistant,” who can help do everything from refilling prescriptions and filling out Medicaid forms to finding support groups. Individuals pay $300 a month for this kind of concierge service, although a majority of Wellthy’s business now comes through companies that make this part of their benefit packages, having recognized the losses in productivity associated with the endless demands that caretaking makes on their employees’ time. In a recent study by the Harvard Business School, researchers found that more than 80 percent of employees with caregiving responsibilities admitted that caregiving affected their productivity. More entrepreneurs are also realizing the market potential in modernizing child care. Wonder School, for example, has attracted $24.1 million in funding in just two years. It has an online platform matching parents with care providers, but it also runs a “launch boot camp,” which helps people interested in opening their own in-home day care centers and preschools navigate the licensing process, create a website and find mentoring (for a 10 percent cut of their profits). Newer start-ups have a lot to learn from the missteps of older companies, like Care.com, which recently saw its stock value tumble when its vetting practices came under scrutiny, according to The Wall Street Journal. Care.com, which matches families and nannies in addition to providing a suite of other services, claims to have served 34 million people in 20 countries to date. The danger here is that these innovations will serve only those who can afford them, leaving the families who really need the support behind yet again. In fact, there has long been an under-the-radar national network of nonprofit centers that both connect working parents to child care and train child care providers. It’s called Child Care Resource and Referral, and the centers are known as CCR&Rs. They began popping up in the 1960s when women started entering the work force en masse. Today, there are CCR&Rs in 47 states, which draw on a variety of funding sources, including block grants, to do their essential grass-roots work. But finding quality child care is only one part of the puzzle. Joseph Jones, the founder and chief executive of a nonprofit called the Center for Urban Families, has been working with low-income families in Baltimore for 20 years. His organization works with 1,400 people a year, 70 percent of them parents. He says the hidden barrier to consistent child care is transportation. “These families have to take multiple buses just to drop their kids off, and then they’ve got to get to work,” Mr. Jones says. “One thing goes wrong and everything is thrown off, not to mention how the juggle cuts down on their ability to spend nurturing quality time with their kids.” There is reason to be hopeful, however, especially at the state level, which Ms. Gupta of Caring Across Generations identifies as the “front line of care.” Many states — Hawaii and Washington foremost among them — are adopting policies that demonstrate an overdue commitment to caretaking. Gov. Jay Inslee of Washington recently signed into law the nation’s first state-operated long-term-care insurance program for the public — a remarkable feat in that it required getting a state legislature behind a program that would raise taxes. There is progress at the national level, too. Early last year, Congress passed a bipartisan $2.4 billion increase for the Child Care Development Block Grant. Now, many presidential hopefuls are not only talking about care, but are outlining new policy proposals. A universal family care policy, like one Caring Across Generations proposed in June, would make caretaking and holding down a job easier for middle-class families (many of whom can’t afford care but also don’t qualify for assistance), and increase wages and stability for professional care workers. Grace Whiting, the president and chief executive of the National Alliance for Caregiving, explains: “It’s not a red and blue issue. Most of the caregiving legislation that’s been passed has, crazily enough, been passed under Trump’s administration. You have people on both sides of the aisle who have recognized that caregiving is an issue begging for creative solutions.” It is important to have a health insurance for any individual and you can check your eligibility for catastrophic health insurance pa and explore best plans for you. Between navigating campus life and completing coursework, incoming freshmen are unlikely to be concerned about their health insurance coverage. But aside from getting oriented and stocking up on dorm room essentials, getting health insurance should be a top task on students' checklists. Most colleges and universities require students to have health insurance, and chances are they're already listed as a dependent on a parent's plan, which they are eligible to stay on until age 26, under the Affordable Care Act. Students can also opt to join a campus health plan. Though there are many ways for students to remain covered, insurance options and rules can be confusing. So, if your child is headed to college, here are health insurance options to consider.
Here's what to know about health insurance for college students:
Students May Have Access to Insurance Through Their College or University Some colleges include a health insurance plan with tuition. You may be able to get the plan removed and reduce tuition costs by several thousand dollars a year, but in order to do so, you'll likely need to get a waiver every school year by showing proof that your kid is insured under your own health care plan. You Must Notify Your Health Insurance Agent That Your Child Is Enrolled in College "Most health benefits plans provide coverage for the customer's child when they go to college, though parents should check to be sure there are in-network health care providers where the child will be in school," says Douglas Nemecek, chief medical officer at Cigna Behavioral Health. "They also need to understand how the plan will or will not reimburse providers who are out-of-network. If there does not appear to be providers available in-network, the child may benefit from also being covered by the school plan," Nemecek says. Vered DeLeeuw, the founder and author of the blog HealthyRecipesBlogs.com, echoes similar sentiments. DeLeeuw, who is based in San Francisco, has two daughters; her oldest is a sophomore at Harvard. "Her freshman year, we declined the university health insurance and kept her on our own health insurance," DeLeeuw says. But this past summer, before her daughter's sophomore year, DeLeeuw learned that her daughter might not be covered for nonemergency services in Massachusetts. "So I called our insurance, and they confirmed that while she'll be covered for emergency care in Massachusetts, she won't have regular health care coverage or prescription coverage," DeLeeuw says. This year, she has her daughter on the family's health care plan and the school's plan. "The college health care plan is fairly affordable – around $3,000 per year. It's definitely worth the peace of mind," DeLeeuw says. "Yes, she can get basic health care at the university clinic regardless of insurance. But if she needs a prescription medication, or if she needs to see a doctor outside of Harvard Health, it's good to know that she's covered." Discuss Medical Care Options and Parental Involvement Your kids understandably want their independence, but ask if they'd still like Mom and Dad to be somewhat involved in the health care part of their lives – and they may appreciate it, given that they will be plenty busy with academics and their social life. "Parents may also want to discuss with their child the option to sign a release of information about medical care when the student seeks care at school," Nemecek says. "Otherwise, the school and medical providers will not release any information to the parents, since the student is over 18 and considered an adult. This is another important issue for families to address when students go off to college." If your child has any pre-existing conditions, it's especially important to discuss how involved you'll be. There are other reasons parents may want to be involved and attuned to their child's medical care, including mental health issues to serious injuries. You'll Likely Want to Keep Students With Pre-Existing Conditions on Your Plan Gail Trauco, a registered nurse who runs the company Medical Bill 911, a consumer education website that teaches people how to save money on their medical expenses, says going with only the college health plan may be a better option for some parents. However, she cautions that there are some downsides. "If the college offers a plan, it may be limited to use of the college's affiliated hospital or medical system. Out-of-pocket deductibles may also be higher and as much as $10,000 to $15,000 dollars annually," she says. "A college student with a pre-existing condition or chronic illness will receive more benefit to remain on the parent's health plan," Trauco says. In any case, if you are thinking of choosing either your health plan or the college health plan, "you need to think about your total health care costs, not just the monthly premium cost that is paid to your insurance company," Trauco says. She adds that some of the considerations include the deductible for each plan, the copayments and out-of-pocket costs. A lower premium pa health insurance is not a benefit for patients with a chronic or life-threatening illness that requires a great deal of medical oversight, treatment and routine prescription medications. It’s always advisable to have a separate health insurance policy apart from the cover provided by your employer. First you may change your job and the new employer may not provide you with the same benefits, or the health insurance cover provided by the employer may be very little. An individual plan ensures you are sufficiently insured even when you are in and out of jobs, and in case your office policy is not enough. The good thing is the rules allow you to use the second policy if you exhaust the cover in the previous one. Suppose you have two health policies—basic indemnity plans that pay for hospitalization—one with a sum insured of Rs1 lakh and the other with a sum insured of Rs2 lakh. In case your bill comes to Rs2.5 lakh, you can exhaust the policy with a sum insured of Rs2 lakh and use the other one to pay the difference of Rs50,000. You can choose the policy you want to make a claim. Also keep in mind that the condition of contribution does not apply to health insurance. Condition of contribution is a practice where if you have two policies insuring the same risk then the claim needs to be paid by both the policies. But in the case of health insurance, if you have two policies, the insurers can’t insist that you use both to pay for the claim. You can choose the policy you want to use and if it’s not enough, move on to the next to pay the difference. When you use two policies to pay for a single claim, usually only one policy can be used in the cashless form. Suppose you need to pay Rs2 lakh for knee replacement, and you have an employer cover of Rs1 lakh and your own individual cover for another Rs1 lakh. Here, you would need to use both to pay the hospital. When you approach a hospital, it will send your documents to one insurer for cashless approval. Once the insurer approves the amount, the hospital will ask you to pay the balance Rs1 lakh, which you will have to pay from your pocket at the time. On discharge, the insurer will send a settlement letter to the hospital mentioning the amount paid. You will need this settlement letter—ask the hospital or the insurer—to approach the second insurer. The settlement letter will have all the details such as the treatment undertaken, amount paid, policy details and date of admission. Usually, the settlement letter is enough to approach the second insurer for reimbursing the balance money you paid from your own pocket. You can also get additional documents from the cashless insurer, who will stamp the documents with the amount it has paid so far, so that there is no double payment. You can easily get best plans by exploring best health insurance harrisburg for you and your family. Employee benefits are an important part of recruiting and retaining talent and most plan sponsors offer a range of benefits, including medical, pharmacy, behavioral health, dental, vision, disability and life. A common industry practice has been to offer each of these benefits as a standalone product, but this creates a disconnected picture of the whole person’s health and can lead to gaps in care and delays in diagnosis and treatment. Recently, however, more employers are rethinking how they can package and integrate their benefits to make them not only more attractive, but work better and keep their employees healthier. Additionally, integration helps by simplifying the consumer experience, while reducing the cost of care. Keeping employees healthy is key to a company’s ability to operate their business, retain stability of their workforce and reduce healthcare costs. For example, absenteeism is a major source of lost productivity and revenue for employers, costing about $226 billion per year, according to the Society for Human Resource Management. When absenteeism is coupled with rising healthcare costs for employers and consumers alike, it becomes clear that preventative treatment and early diagnosis is vital. When healthcare benefits are integrated and coordinated to treat the whole person, it can improve employees’ health by identifying and closing gaps in care and help them get back to work sooner. Many employers already recognize the value of integrating their health benefit plans. According to a recent study conducted by Anthem, 71% of employers surveyed are either actively integrating or considering integrating their medical, vision, dental, pharmacy, and/or disability benefits in the next five years — this represents an 11% increase from data collected in 2016. The study also found that among those surveyed who are actively integrating or considering integrating benefits nearly 100% of them reported integrating medical plans with pharmacy, vision, dental, and/or disability benefits and the overwhelming preference is for integration with a single insurance carrier versus multiple carriers. When all of the patient’s medical practitioners, including dentists and optometrists, have access to their relevant health history, providers can co-manage chronic conditions, increase early detection capabilities and coordinate with other providers. For example, if a patient is taking a medication for diabetes that causes dry mouth and forgets to mention it to their dentist, the dentist can access their medical claims to see the patient’s prescription history and take preventative action before further dental issues occur. This provides a fuller picture of an employee’s medical history. Integrating health data can also simplify and safeguard patient care to prevent complications. If your employee can’t remember the name of a medication they’re currently taking, it can create confusion for their doctor, particularly since two similar-sounding medications can do very different things and require very different advice. Imagine a scenario where an employee is taking two different medications for two different conditions, unknowingly putting themselves in a situation where the treatment for either or both no longer work, or worse, are contraindicated. This disconnect can cause unnecessary costs and lost productivity in the workplace, not to mention the risk to an employee’s health. By giving care providers access to relevant medical prescription histories, they can eliminate the potential disconnect in care and empower them to make more informed and effective decisions. Further, insight from other providers can help with early detection of issues not caught in routine screenings. For example, if an optometrist discovers retinal bleeding, they can flag this information for the patient’s primary care provider to follow up with a diabetes evaluation. Recently, a Deloitte research report showed that the American corporate wellness market — which includes healthcare — is one of employers’ top concerns and is already worth more than $8 billion. This market is expected to continue to grow as wellness is projected to reach over $11 billion by 2021. To help curtail these costs, employers should be offering integrated benefits solutions that place a premium on the whole employee’s health with the knowledge that it will benefit the organization in the end. By providing each of your employees’ medical practitioners with complete pictures of their health, you can address these challenges, reduce health care costs for your business, improve the treatment your employees receive and in turn, increase your business’s productivity and bottom line. After all, the various systems within the human body are interconnected, so shouldn’t our healthcare reflect that, too? Get insured your whole family by exploring the family health plan york and if you want to know more then please contact us in the comment section. Medicare eligibility – Part A and Part B To be eligible for Medicare Part A and Part B, you must be a U.S. citizen or a permanent legal resident for at least five continuous years. You must also meet at least one of the following criteria for Medicare eligibility: Be age 65 or older and eligible for Social Security: You may be automatically enrolled in Medicare Part A (hospital insurance) when you reach age 65 and become eligible for Social Security. Further, if you are already getting benefits from Social Security or the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB), you will automatically get Part A and Part B starting the first day of the month you turn 65. (If your birthday is on the first day of the month, your Part A and Part B coverage starts the first day of the prior month.) But, if you’re not receiving retirement benefits from Social Security or the Railroad Retirement Board (for instance, because you’re still working), you must sign up for Medicare Part B when you meet the age requirement, as your enrollment isn’t automatic. Be permanently disabled and receive disability benefits for at least two years: You automatically get Part A and Part B after you get disability benefits from Social Security for 24 months or certain disability benefits from the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) for 24 months. Have end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (permanent kidney failure that requires dialysis treatment or a kidney transplant): You need to sign up for Medicare, as your enrollment isn’t automatic. Have Lou Gehrig’s disease (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, or ALS): You automatically get Part A and Part B the month your disability benefits begin.Most individuals don’t have to pay a premium for Medicare Part A if they or their spouse paid Medicare taxes while working for at least 10 years (or 40 quarters). If you’re not eligible for premium-free Part A, you will have to pay a monthly premium of up to $437 in 2019. In addition, you must also pay the Part B premium each month. The standard premium is $135.50 in 2019. Also, keep in mind that individuals with a higher income may have to pay more for their Part B premium. Be aware that if you don’t sign up for Medicare Part B when you first become eligible, you may have to pay a 10% penalty (added to your monthly premium) for each full 12-month period you could have had it but didn’t sign up (some exceptions apply). Medicare Part C eligibility: Medicare Part C (also called Medicare Advantage ) is an alternative way to your Medicare Part A and Part B benefits. Medicare Advantage plans are available through private insurers. To be eligible for Medicare Part C, you must already be enrolled in Medicare Part A and Part B, and you must reside within the service area of the Medicare Advantage plan you want. You can get more information about and enroll in a Medicare Advantage plan by contacting one of the following:
The Medicare Advantage plan (Part C) Initial Coverage Election Period is generally the same as the Initial Enrollment Period for Medicare Part A and Part B (the seven-month period that starts 3 months before the month you turn 65, includes the month you turn 65, and ends 3 months after the month you turn 65). Or, you can sign up during the Annual Election Period (AEP) from October 15 to December 7 for coverage effective January 1 of the following year. You can also enroll during a Special Election Period (SEP), if you qualify. If you have end-stage renal disease (ESRD), you might not qualify for a Medicare Advantage plan in most cases. But there’s one type of Medicare Advantage plan that’s specifically meant for people with ESRD. Read about Medicare Special Needs Plans. Medicare Part C is optional, and there is no penalty for not signing up. But you must have Medicare Part A and Part B to get Part C, and live in the service area of a Medicare Advantage plan. You also generally can’t have end-stage renal disease (with some exceptions). If you have Medicare Part C, you must continue paying your Part B premium even if you enroll in a Medicare Advantage plan. Monthly rates and plan coverage for Medicare Advantage plans vary by the insurance company you choose and your specific plan details. Medicare Part D eligibility: Medicare Part D covers prescription drugs and, like Medicare Part C, is available through private insurers that are approved by Medicare. To be eligible to enroll in a Medicare prescription drug plan (PDP), you must have Medicare Part A and/or Part B and you must live in the service area for the prescription drug plan in which you want to enroll. To be eligible to enroll in a Medicare Advantage plan with prescription drug coverage (MAPD), you must have Medicare Part A and Part B, and you must live in the service area for the MAPD plan you’re considering. Get insured your whole family by exploring the family health plan york and if you want to know more then please contact us in the comment section. Medicare forms the foundation of health care coverage for Americans age 65 and older. Medicare does not work the same ways as a traditional health insurance plan while you are working, it is not free, and it will not cover all your health care expenses. Here’s how it works. A portion of Medicare coverage, Part A, is free for most Americans who worked in the U.S. and thus paid payroll taxes for many years. Part A is called “hospital insurance.” If you qualify for Social Security, you will qualify for Part A. Part B, referred to as medical insurance, is not free. You pay a monthly premium for Medicare Part B. Part B is the portion of Medicare that more closely resembles what you may think of as traditional health insurance. Let’s take a look at what Medicare Part B covers. In general, Medicare Part B covers medically necessary services and supplies needed to diagnose and treat a medical condition. Medicare Part B also covers certain types of preventative care. Let’s start by looking at some of the preventative services covered. Preventative Services You usually will not pay extra for preventative services. Below is a sample of the preventive services covered by Medicare Part B. Additional services not listed here may also be available. Some of the preventative services covered are: alcohol misuse screenings, bone density measurements, cardiovascular disease screenings, mammograms, cancer screenings (such as for cervical, colorectal, prostate, etc.) diabetes screenings, depression screenings, diabetes screenings, flu shots, glaucoma tests (if you are considered to be at high risk for this disease), pneumococcal shot, and a yearly “wellness” visit. Other Medically Necessary Services There are other items covered by Part B in addition to preventive services. For many of these items, a deductible may apply, and you may pay 20 percent of the Medicare-approved cost. For this reason, many people also have a Medicare Supplement policy, sometimes called a Medigap policy, to help cover the “gaps” in coverage. Here are some other items covered by Part B which may be subject to the deductible and co-pay: ambulance services, cardiac rehabilitation, a portion of outpatient chemotherapy, implanted defibrillator, diabetes supplies, durable medical equipment (like oxygen equipment, wheelchairs, walkers), certain types of medically necessary home health services, kidney dialysis and supplies, physical therapy, second surgical opinions, tests such as MRIs, CT scans, EKG/ECGs, and a CPAP trial (for up to three months) if you have been diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. Lab Services Medicare Part B also covers most lab services such as blood tests, urinalysis, and tests on tissue samples. Usually, you will not pay extra for these lab services. What Isn't Covered By Medicare Part B? Most dental care, including dentures, is not covered under any portion of Medicare. Eye examinations related to prescribing glasses (vs. related to an illness or issue), cosmetic surgery, acupuncture, hearing aids, fitting exams related to hearing aids, and concierge services are not covered by Medicare Part B or by any other part of Medicare. Also, many people are not aware that Medicare will not cover long-term care. Long-term care is non-medical care related to the six activities of daily living. For example, many people need help later in life with activities like bathing, dressing, preparing meals, and using the restroom. This type of care is not covered under Medicare. Medicare Part A does cover a portion of costs for skilled nursing home care, but only after a 3-day minimum inpatient hospital stay. Many people need skilled nursing home care due to a disability or disease but don’t meet the minimum hospital stay requirement. This means you cannot count on Medicare Part A or Part B to cover nursing home or long-term care expenses. However, if your income and assets are low enough, you may become eligible for Medicaid. If you are eligible for Medicaid and your nursing home or long-term care is deemed medically necessary, then Medicaid (not Medicare) may cover the cost. It is important to have health insurance for any individual and you can check your eligibility for private health insurance pa and explore best plans for you. |
Author
Archives
January 2020
|